Why should we keep the electoral college
What is its purpose? Take New York and Virginia, the largest slave states in the North and South, respectively, according to the census, just after the Constitutional Convention.
InRepublican Benjamin Harrisonwith 5, popular votes won electoral votes. Finally, proponents of the Electoral College can rely upon the argument that the Founders created the Electoral College for a reason.
Given that a change would require a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress and three-quarters of the state legislatures, it is not going to happen. The great problems with our presidential selection system today stem from the haphazard way we choose the two major party presidential candidates.
Only "appointment by the people," he insisted, would guarantee a national executive free of such dependence and fully able to keep Congress and the states from careening off the republican track.
Electoral college debate
This is not complicated. He sees no stability. And this is how a bunch of supernaturally self-deluded apes came to inherit the Earth. A Democracy or Not? The US has elected two minority presidents in the last 20 years because of the Electoral College. Not one was a first-rank president, but their selection did not seriously injure the democratic character of our system. The Electoral College system also helps to ensure that the winning candidate has a broad base of electoral support in two ways. Since a national level of support is required because of the Electoral College, minority causes, interests, and concerns are given a voice that reaches a national level. There is a risk of faithless electors casting ballots. And in , Donald Trump garnered 2. And it bears recollecting that holding a direct presidential election might not be any less cumbersome than the Electoral College. Requiring a two-thirds vote from both houses, a constitutional amendment must have strong bi-partisan support—support it will not get from a split Congress. Or is it working the way it is supposed to?
The two parties have chosen the same year in which to nominate a person whom large numbers of Americans, probably a majority, regard as unfit though not for the same reason.
And these awful products of motivated reasoning are joined by the awful products of status quo bias which leads some small number of liberals to defend the Electoral College in a noxious stew of nonsensical arguments against allowing popular democracy to determine control of at least one branch of our government.
There is a risk of faithless electors casting ballots.
Why we need the electoral college
He appears to have concluded that an Electoral College system based on representation would improve this balance and keep presidential elections from becoming sectional affairs. Some founders favored the popular vote; others wanted to leverage their chattel into disproportionate political power. And eventually, their successors developed a more optimal means of camouflaging their own interests in arguments about procedural fairness: They became adept at convincing themselves that justice required whatever arbitrary principle would get them the biggest slice of fish — and thus, betrayed no signs of deceit when trying to convince others. That probably promotes a more national and less regional vision. Based on what you know right now, do you think the Electoral College is an important part of the United States election process? And it bears recollecting that holding a direct presidential election might not be any less cumbersome than the Electoral College. Here, again, there are three main points to make. So far, 14 states have signed on to the agreement, and hold a combined electoral votes. This produced spontaneity; it also produced stupidity. But set off a swell of complaints nonetheless. Presidential electors are not more qualified than other citizens to determine who should head the government. The US has elected two minority presidents in the last 20 years because of the Electoral College. If enough states were willing to adopt this popular vote strategy through state law, then an outright abolishment of the Electoral College through constitutional amendment would be an option.
They do not matter because they have any special civic characteristics. But campaigning in 10 or 12 states is better than trying to score points in just two. The Articles were, in their own terms, only "a firm league of friendship with each other," in which "[e]ach state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right.
Gouverneur Morris joined Wilson in arguing over the course of two days that If the Legislature elect, it will be the work of intrigue, of cabal, and of faction; it will be like the election of a pope by a conclave of cardinals Every presidential election, candidates campaign in a state-by-state race, not only to win the most votes, but also to win their respective electoral votes.
based on 53 review