Bertrand russell unpopular essays philosophy and politics
Even his advocacy of democracy is not fanatical; in fact, he gives us concrete historical examples of the evil consequences of a fanatical advocacy of democracy. You might as well try to recompose Mozart.
Thus an undogmatic and liberal attitude has to be advocated in the political sphere. But Russell allows himself a touch of optimism. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Philosophy and politics by russell pdf
It is a pleasure to agree and a privilege to disagree with a mind like this. Green was a Liberal. You are on page 1of 20 Search inside document a Philosophy and Politics ern Europe, on the one hand by the excellence of their philosophers, and on the other hand by their contempt for philosophy. It is hard to say whether this is more because of his nearly impossible intellectual and moral standards or because of the increased state control. This is the way in which opinions are held in science as opposed to the way in which they are held in theology. The spectacle of the writhing torments of the victims was, in fact, one of the principal pleasures to which the populace looked forward to enliven a somewhat drab existence. The amount of cruelty inflicted by such beliefs since time immemorial is truly incalculable. It begins with the complete demolition of Plato and Hegel. The Koran?
After the one false step, his mental agility quickly takes him far into the quagmire of falsehood. If we could be certain that all mankind will be happy through the abolition of private capitalism, it would then be right to pursue this end by means of dictatorships, concentration camps, and world wars.
People in the West thought this characteristic of the Balkans, forgetting that Cromwell and Robespierre had acted likewise.
The scope is vast almost beyond comprehension, from religious fanaticism and persecution to state-sanctioned racism and the war between the sexes, but the wit and wisdom of the writing is what makes it unique.
Tell me about it!
The future of mankind unpopular essays pdf
People in the West thought this characteristic of the Balkans, forgetting that Cromwell and Robespierre had acted likewise. Now, I know next to nothing about either man, but Russell makes me want to rectify my ignorance as regards both. Thus, we pay them the highest compliment we can; our familiarity acknowledges that they are alive for us. So long as men are not trained to withhold judgment in the absence of evidence, they will be led astray by cocksure prophets, and it is likely that their leaders will be either ignorant fanatics or dishonest charlatans. Quotes[ edit ] Dogmatism and skepticism are both, in a sense, absolute philosophies; one is certain of knowing , the other of not knowing. What are UN and EU if not primitive forms of that? It can quite easily be expounded lucidly in words of one syllable, but then its absurdity becomes obvious. This, they would say, has as little to do with the phi- losopher as with the physicist or the chemist. For my part, I find even eternal damnation less incredible, certainly less ridiculous, than this lame and impotent conclusion which we are asked to admire as the supreme effort of Omnipotence. Evolution in this sense means an orderly progress towards a goal which is never quite attained. For the learning of every virtue there is an appropriate discipline, and for the learning of suspended judgment the best discipline is philosophy. Thus both Hegel and Marx advocated an autocratic system, though the kind of autocracy in the two cases is different. During World War II, for instance, no country showed a greater solidarity than Britain which had a democratic system of government and which did not rely upon the kind of dogmas preached by the Nazis, the Fascists, and the Marxists.
based on 37 review